Skip to main content

Graphical Maturity Profile

The graphical maturity profile visualizes the structural maturity of the CARE-IT foundational principles (P1–P8) and, optionally, the domains (D1–D6).

It is not a score.
It is not an overall rating.
It is not a certification representation.

It makes structural tensions, inconsistencies, and development areas visible.

Principle Profile (P1–P8)​

Example Visualization​

CARE-IT maturity profile across principles P1–P8

The principle profile shows how stable the normative foundation of the organization is.

A balanced profile does not imply equal distribution,
but structural coherence.

Low maturity in safety-critical principles
(for example P5 – Patient Safety)
limits the interpretation of the overall profile.

Interpretation of the Principle Profile​

A maturity profile makes visible:

  • where structural stability exists,
  • where responsibility remains implicit,
  • where innovation capability is not safeguarded,
  • where information integrity may be at risk,
  • where risk decisions lack clarity.

The profile supports prioritization —
not classification as “good” or “bad.”

Domain Profile (D1–D6)​

In addition to principles, maturity can be visualized at the domain level.

The domains (D1–D6) represent organizational action spaces
in which the principles manifest concretely.

A domain profile illustrates:

  • structural transparency,
  • governance capability,
  • organizational consistency,
  • operational stability.

A strong principle profile combined with weak domain maturity
indicates implementation gaps.

A strong domain profile combined with weak principle maturity
may indicate formal structure without normative clarity.

Current / Target Profile​

Example Comparison​

CARE-IT maturity profile: current versus target state

Comparing current and target profiles supports:

  • strategic prioritization,
  • structured roadmap planning,
  • conscious resource allocation,
  • governance focus.

Important:
The target profile is not an idealized maximum state.
It represents a realistically intended maturity level
within the context of clinical mandate, risk exposure, and available resources.

Heterogeneous Maturity Is Normal​

Different maturity levels across principles or domains
are not errors, but reflections of organizational reality.

Example:

  • High lifecycle sustainability (P6)
  • Low innovation capability (P8)
  • Medium information integrity (P7)

The goal is not equalization,
but conscious governance aligned with clinical effectiveness
and patient safety.

Workshop Application​

The maturity profile is typically:

  • developed per clinical system constellation,
  • discussed interdisciplinarily,
  • documented with brief justification,
  • reviewed periodically.

Recommended sequence:

  1. Develop the principle profile
  2. Complement with domain profile (if meaningful)
  3. Identify structural tensions
  4. Derive prioritized development measures

Methodological Notes​

  • No point aggregation
  • No averages
  • No ranking between clinical system constellations
  • No certification statements

The quality of reasoning matters more than the size of the visualized area.

Maturity describes structural robustness —
not performance.